Korean Restaurant Owner's Van Vandalized With White Supremacist Grafitti In Bozeman, Montana; Suspicion Being Directed Towards Montana Creativity

A van belonging to the owner of a Korean restaurant in Bozeman, Montana has been vandalized with white power graffiti for the second time in two months, and suspicion is being directed towards the Montana unit of The Creativity Movement, known officially as TCM Montana. Main story published December 14th, 2009 by the Bozeman Daily Chronicle.

When 51-year-old I-Ho Pomeroy, who owns I-Ho's Korean Grill, went out to her van early on Sunday December 13th, she found the inscription “White Power” and a backwards swastika scrawled across the rear window in white temporary paint. And this wasn’t the first time; her van was marked the same way back in October 2009 while parked outside her restaurant just days before the hate-free march through downtown Bozeman. The first time, she just blew it off and erased the paint, because she doesn't consider that behavior representative of Bozeman. But the second time, she decided to report it to police, because her vehicle was the only one on Greenway Avenue to be vandalized.

And already, suspicion is being directed towards TCM Montana, primarily because the Creators have been distributing pro-White literature within the community before demonstrating at the Gallatin County Courthouse in September while wearing masks. Police Lt. Rich McLane says he doesn't know who's responsible, “It may or may not be connected to the Creativity Movement,” McLane said. But he believes it to be an isolated incident.

However, it would be illogical for members of TCM Montana to be engaging in vandalism. Not only would it undermine the value of their previous activism and turn the white community further against them, but it would be a violation of their own charter. Under "The Essence of a Creator", Item II states, "A Creator is responsible, productive, and constructive", and Item V states, "A Creator realizes that both love and hate, in order to be constructive, must be directed in the proper channels and to do otherwise is destructive and suicidal". Vandalism is neither responsible, productive, or constructive.

Most likely the vandalism was perpetrated by teenagers out for kicks. This would explain the backwards swastika; teenagers aren't sufficiently educated to appreciate such distinctions. But it is also possible it could be a false flag ops by anti-racists. Fueled by the presence of Montana State University, anti-racist sentiment is particularly virulent in Bozeman, as former National Alliance member Kevin McGuire found out in 2005 when he was outed as a NA member while running for a school board seat. Despite a torrent of abuse unleashed upon him by anti-racists, McGuire scored 3.7 percent of the vote (McGuire was still politically active in Bozeman as recently as 2008). But anti-racists elsewhere have been known to commit "white power vandalism" so that it would be blamed on white activists and turn the community against them.

The two incidents haven’t changed I-Ho Pomeroy's favorable assessment of the city. “I’m still very thankful,” Pomeroy said. “I thought America was the great melting pot -- that we all come together and make this country great. It’ll be okay because the majority of people are very kind." On Tuesday December 15th, many in the community decided to express solidarity with I-Ho Pomeroy by organizing somewhat of a "mass dine-in" at her restaurant during lunch hour.

Day 5 Of The Bill White Roanoke Trial: Bill White's Defense Team Exposes Canadian Gadfly Richard Warman As An Agent Provocateur For The CHRC

December 15th, 2009 was the day that notorious Canadian human rights gadfly Richard Warman walked into a Roanoke courtroom to lower the boom on national socialist activist Bill White - and may have also walked into a trap cunningly set by Bill White and his defense team. Warman ended up being induced, under oath, to confess his activities as an agent provocateur for the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC).

-- Roanoke Times blog coverage of the entire trial HERE.
-- Roanoke Times blog coverage of Day 5 only HERE.
-- Archive of Roanoke Times print stories of entire case HERE.
-- Vanguard News Network Forum mega-thread HERE.
-- All posts on the Bill White Roanoke trial available HERE, with the most recent post displaying first.

WSLS Channel 10 news video embedded below:



Warman was one of the primary targets of Bill White's activism. On pp 5-6 of the 19-page indictment, White is accused of posting Warman's home address on the Internet and sending him a copy of National Socialist Magazine. He also allegedly republished an article about the firebombing of a Canadian political candidate's home, and urged someone to do the same to Warman. He's also accused of urging people to kill Richard Warman.

However, Richard Warman has a very checkered past himself, which the defense quickly brought out during Warman's four hours on the stand. Although Warman claimed to be "terrorized" by Bill White's activism, Warman admitted under cross examination that he said in a 2005 speech that it was fun to bring legal action against white supremacists under Canada’s human rights act. Warman also said that if he found someone to be particularly annoying, he might move them up on the list a bit. But Warman tried to cover his tracks by saying that “those were two rather weak attempts at humor to keep the audience’s attention.”

Defense attorney David Damico also questioned Warman about his practice of using false names to participate in online discussions among racists in Internet chat rooms. Warman said he was trying to gather intelligence, although he finally conceded that the Canadian Human Rights Commission once said the practice diminished his credibility. Ezra Levant, who is NOT a white nationalist, revealed back in September that Warman himself has been under investigation by the CHRC for hate speech. More details about Warman's use of false names on WN discussion forums to induce illegal activity are published on the Richard Warman website.

Additional abuses by Richard Warman are posted on Dr. David Duke's website as well as on Voice Of Deseret, the latter which shows that Warman hasn't just targeted "racists", but also conservatives.

The expected impact of Warman's testimony is that it could increase the chances of a hung jury, or perhaps an outright acquittal. Jurors are likely to compare the track records of both Bill White and Richard Warman, and wonder why White is being punished for doing the same things that Richard Warman is allowed to do.

During the afternoon hours of the trial, former South Harrison Township (NJ) Mayor Charles Tyson also gave testimony. Tyson said he received a late-night phone call and a subsequent e-mail from Bill White that left him "petrified". White allegedly told Tyson that no black man should govern whites, and that he was going to put a Nazi sign in his front yard.

More background on Richard Warman is necessary to explain why he is considered of such great concern, not only to white nationalist activists, but also to other free speech activists as well. Canadian free speech activist Paul Fromm has further researched and published the impact of Richard Warman on Canadian Human Rights Tribunal cases. He has tracked the cases heard by the CHRT, and provides a statistical sketch of their results on the Freedom-Site, operated by the Canadian Freedom Resource Center. The information is current as of November 2007:

The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal

Active and Past cases: 46
Cases the tribunal ruled on: 37
Total complaints received by CHRC: 100

- 0% of respondents have ever won a section 13 case before the tribunal.

- 100% of cases have Whites as respondents

- 98% of cases have poor or working class respondents

- 90.7% of respondents are not represented by lawyers

- So far, $93,000 has been awarded in fines and special compensation since 2003.

- 35 respondents have lifetime speech bans (Cease and Desist) orders and if not followed the victims could face up to 5 years in prison.

- 72.4% of complaints specifically identify "jews" as victims.

- 48.8% of all cases are by Richard Warman

-- Every Decision on Section 13 case (Active and Past cases), in PDF format.

What permits Richard Warman to initiate these witch-hunts? In this previous post, I presented a brief explanation of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which was designed to prevent the public communication of hate. This section has been the source of constant dispute, since the very definition of "hate" itself has been disputed. Here's the text of Section 13 itself:

Hate messages

13. (1) It is a discriminatory practice for a person or a group of persons acting in concert to communicate telephonically or to cause to be so communicated, repeatedly, in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking within the legislative authority of Parliament, any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by reason of the fact that that person or those persons are identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.

Interpretation

(2) For greater certainty, subsection (1) applies in respect of a matter that is communicated by means of a computer or a group of interconnected or related computers, including the Internet, or any similar means of communication, but does not apply in respect of a matter that is communicated in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a broadcasting undertaking.

Interpretation

(3) For the purposes of this section, no owner or operator of a telecommunication undertaking communicates or causes to be communicated any matter described in subsection (1) by reason only that the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking owned or operated by that person are used by other persons for the transmission of that matter.

R.S., 1985, c. H-6, s. 13; 2001, c. 41, s. 88.

Day 4 Of The Bill White Federal Trial In Roanoke: FBI Agents Testify, Virginia Beach Apartment Complex Residents Complain That White Scared Them

On Day 4 of the Federal trial of national socialist activist Bill White in Roanoke, Virginia, attention was focused on a number of other alleged "victims". Informational testimony was also given by others deemed germane to the case. General media stories from WSLS Channel 10 and WDBJ Channel 7.

-- Roanoke Times blog coverage of the entire trial HERE.
-- Roanoke Times blog coverage of Day 4 only HERE.
-- Archive of Roanoke Times print stories of entire case HERE.
-- Vanguard News Network Forum mega-thread HERE.
-- All posts on the Bill White Roanoke trial available HERE, with the most recent post displaying first.

First up was Douglas Hantske, a National Alliance member who lives in Leonard Pitts' home state of Maryland. Hantske first disavowed any connection between the National Alliance and Bill White's American National Socialist Workers Party (ANSWP). Hantske hinted that he targeted Pitts' neighborhood with a literature drop after obtaining Pitts' address from White's Overthrow.com website. The National Alliance Maryland Unit's own website, which is a bit dated, is available HERE.

Next up was David Church, the lead FBI agent in the investigation of White. Church previewed the case against three other entities allegedly threatened by White, to include a group of apartment tenants in Virginia Beach, Kathleen Kerr, who is a university administrator in Delaware, and Canadian "human rights" lawyer Richard Warman. On defense cross-examination, Church testified that Bill White told him that his Internet postings and e-mails were “outlandish” and meant to be political satire. He said White also told him that he never intended for anyone to get hurt, but was “simply mocking” people with whom he disagreed, usually over matters of race.

But Church still still considered White’s mailings to more than a dozen Virginia Beach apartment tenants and emails to Pulitzer Prize winning columnist Leonard Pitts to be threatening, and a second FBI agent, Paul Messing, a computer analyst who spent weeks going through White’s stored computer hardware and software gathering potential evidence, agreed with Church.

Then Tiese Mitchell, one of the residents of the Virginia Beach apartment complex earlier referenced, gave testimony. She said the letter she received from White scared her so much that she packed her things in 15 minutes and fled. Mitchell said the language of the letter – combined with the realization that White knew where she lived – frightened her so much that she quickly packed her belongings and took her two young children to stay with a relative. A second black resident, who was not identified by the media, also testified against White. Arousing White's interest in this situation was the fact that these apartment complex residents, who are black, had filed a housing discrimination lawsuit against their white landlord. Both women ultimately settled out of court, Mitchell for $27,000, and the other for $22,000.

Background Note: The reason Kathleen Kerr was targeted by Bill White is obvious. Kerr was the director of residential life at the University of Delaware back in 2007, when the school came under fire for a forced diversity brainwashing program which defined all whites as racist and said that no non-whites could ever be racist. Residential assistants at the school enforced the program and reported back to Kerr.

How To Use Holocaust Revisionism Effectively By Challenging The Singularity Of The Holocaust

Over on Occidental Dissent, Hunter Wallace has opened up a discussion about Holocaust Revisionism. He assesses the strengths and weaknesses in the subject as well as the presentation employed by many. On the one hand, he finds himself bored to tears by some of the more nitnoid details, like how many holes were in the shower heads at Auschwitz. He also questions whether or not it is "our fight", considering it took place over in Europe. On the other hand, he reaffirms its relevance to White Nationalism, and notes that the subject has attracted interest among libertarians and constitutionalists who have noted the free speech implications to the suppression of Holocaust Revisionists.

Most importantly, he finds the Holocaust to be irrelevant to engaging in “practical politics.” The Holocaust can end up being a distraction to a pro-White candidate running for elective office. So he suggests that Holocaust Revisionism should not be a plank in a pro-White political platform. Validating this thesis is the fact that our most successful pro-White candidates, Dr. David Duke and John Ubele, did not address the Holocaust during their respective political campaigns. You will also note that Billy Roper does NOT include a Holocaust plank in the platform of his Nationalist Party of America.

To better grasp the wisdom of this approach, we need to identify the critical attributes of the Holocaust, which are the demographics (how many died), the methodology (how they died), and the singularity (a unique genocide). The first two are difficult to sell to the American public, since the moment you claim that less than six million died, Organized Jewry shrieks "Anti-Semite!!!", and the second requires you digest and assimilate a multitude of technical facts that might well prove beyond your grasp, bogging you down.

The third issue is the most promising. The soft underbelly of Holocaust theology is the singularity. Organized Jewry believes their Holocaust is unique, unlike any other. The implication is that genocide against Jews is worse than genocide against others, which also implies that Jewish life is inherently more valuable than non-Jewish life. And this is the foundation of Jewish supremacism.

So instead of getting bogged down and burning up political capital arguing numbers and technology, we attack the singularity of the Holocaust by illustrating how it’s been weaponized to promote political orthodoxy. We show how perfectly law-abiding people have lost their jobs and their freedom for merely disputing facts about the Holocaust. We invite people to ponder why, if the Holocaust story is so inerrant, people are being oppressed for disputing it. We tell them that the truth requires no statutory protection; it can stand on its own merits. This approach can win constitutionalists and libertarians over to our Cause.

Then to win the “values voters” over to our Cause, we ask another question. We ask, “Why do we have 25 museums in the United States to memorialize the alleged six million foreign Jewish victims of a 65-year-old Holocaust, but no museums to memorialize the 50 million American victims of America’s ongoing Holocaust Against The Unborn?”. It also wouldn't hurt to relate how Jewish groups have been browbeating Christian denominations into changing their doctrines to accommodate Jewish sensibilities, not only in their persecution of Mel Gibson over "The Passion of the Christ", but also the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors' 15-year guerrilla war against the LDS Church over the Mormon practice of proxy baptism of the dead.

It also wouldn't hurt to question why, if the six million figure is so inerrant, that there are still less than three million names in the Yad Vashem Memorial database. Surely after 65 years, we would know by now how many Jews died in the Holocaust, wouldn't we?

This approach puts the Holocaust Industry on the defensive, inviting them to expose their own hatred and intolerance of us in the same fashion that Dr. David Duke provoked the Jew Michael Hart to expose his own anti-Gentile bigotry at the 2006 American Renaissance conference.

If people are expecting steak, you can't assuage their hunger by offering them liver.

Four Down, One To Go: George Thomas Found Guilty Of Murder, Etc. In Christian-Newsom Atrocity, Sentenced To Life In Prison In Knoxville

It seemed like national interest in the trials of the perpetrators of the Christian-Newsom atrocity subsided after the conviction of the two "heavies", Letalvis Cobbins and Lemaricus Davidson. But interest by the Christian and Newsom families remained unabated as they watched the fourth defendant to be tried, George Thomas, found guilty on all 38 related charges in the case, and sentenced to life in prison without parole.

The jury, consisting of one black woman, five white men and six white women (the five alternate jurors were two white men and three white women), had an opportunity to choose death, but they decided in less than two hours that mitigating factors outweighed aggravating factors in the case, preventing them from returning a death sentence on December 10th, 2009. Just two days earlier, this same jury found Thomas guilty on 38 charges relating to first-degree murder, felony murder, robbery, kidnapping and rape by the jury of five men and seven women after a six-day trial. WATE Channel 6 news video embedded below:



The case against Thomas seemed weaker than those of the other defendants at the outset. Prosecutors had no DNA, no fingerprints and no eyewitnesses. Thomas had conceded he was inside Davidson’s Chipman Street house where the couple was held captive but insisted he did nothing more than smoke marijuana and bide time until he could leave. Dillard and Johnson contended Thomas’ presence and failure to act was not enough to meet the legal requirements of the criminal responsibility law, which allows a defendant to be rendered equally guilty of crimes committed by another if he or she benefited from the crimes and either aided or attempted to aid the perpetrators.

But prosecutors Takisha Fitzgerald and Leland Price argued Thomas was criminally responsible by his presence and failure to act after he saw the victims brought to Davidson's house.

In reaction, Gary Christian, who clearly wanted a piece of both Cobbins and davidson in the previous trials, was a bit more restrained this time around. "He's going to get what's coming to him in his new life. But in my life, there is nothing but the death penalty," said Channon's father, Gary.

"We can't help but be greedy. We wanted it all...We didn't get a chance to plead for mercy for our children's lives", said Channon's mother, Deena.

"If they had heard what we'd heard, they would've given him the death penalty," said Chris' mother, Mary, while Chris' father Hugh said "There's statements the other defendants made that implicated him far more than what was heard in the trial".

When asked if they were concerned about the defense's acquittal motion, Deena said, "He's (Judge Baumgartner) just taking his time and making sure he does his job well." But Gary conceded that "He won't let that fool (Thomas) back out on the street,"

The one remaining defendant, Vanessa Coleman, will have her trial on May 10th, 2010.

Dissident National Alliance Members Organizing An Effort To Remove Chairman Erich Gliebe

An effort is being launched by reform-minded members of the National Alliance to remove Chairman Erich Gliebe from office. This effort is being discussed on this Stormfront thread and on the EarlTurnerAlliance blog. It is not being discussed on the NA's Resistance Forum, which is rigidly controlled by Gliebe.

It appears they want to replace the executive leadership model with the more collective leadership model employed by European Americans United. It's interesting that this effort has become public just two weeks after the release of former National Alliance Chairman Shaun Walker from prison, but I doubt that he's involved in this effort, because he still has three years probation left. The following statement was posted on Stormfront:

I want to discuss the cancer that is eating away at our Alliance, Erich Gliebe. It is time for us as National Alliance members to make some hard decisions and the changes must start from the top. Erich has had some deep personal problems that we all know about and has become ineffective as our chairman. Erich may have had his heart in the Alliance at one time but I think those days are over. We need new leadership without all the baggage and when I talk about leadership. I talk about trustful leadership of high moral character that is uncompromised by money, lust, greed and continually poor decisions. We need new leadership, not a chairman but a board of directors. For whom are not in the public eye and able to make the tough calls without having their picture made public or derogatory comments made about them. This board should be made up of good members in good standing. All having the best interest of the Alliance as priority. Members willing to put their own needs, personal feelings and ambitions aside. Decisions made on behalf of Alliance business should be made as a vote among the board members and not left to one man to make all the calls on behalf of this great organization.

In this new age [that] the world has pushed us into, it is time for new change and new tactics and new leadership within the National Alliance.

I have been contacted by many other members about this issue. They have brought this to the attention of others in return and we have decided that this is our best course of action at this point. I am not attempting or suggesting to overthrough [overthrow] leadership as was done in the past. I am seriously concerned about the future of Alliance as a whole. This is my plea for what I see as the only course of action that will save it.

Now we know this will upset Erich and we are sorry for that! We hope there will not be retaliation on his behalf as he has done in the past. I ask him not to. We would like Erich to understand our concern.

Proposal one: Erich Gliebe steps down as Chairman and CEO without retaliation, and be relieved all records, files and property that belongs to the National Alliance. All of the above will be immediately given to the business manager only. And Erich Gleibe understands he will not release any information on members to anyone other then the business manager.

Proposal two: A financial audit and asset and property inventory be performed by the business manager to assess the remaining assets of the National Alliance. This audit is to be made available to the remaining members upon request.

Proposal three: A new board of directors comprised of five volunteering members. They are to be elected and charged with returning the National Alliance to its former state and ensure its future success. A board of directors that agrees by majority upon all decisions regarding the National Alliance. Board members must understand that they will be removed if found to be of poor moral character or acting outside the interest of the National Alliance and its mission.

Proposal four: After the audit is complete, all items that Erich Gliebe has been found to have liquidated or sold for his own personal use or debt, Erich Gliebe shall be held accountable for the return of such assets or its monetary value.

We as members, will give this proposal one year. Decisions must be made by the body of the Alliance as a whole. At the next Leadership conference in the fall of 2010 it will be brought to the table and voted on by the members in attendance.

Thank you for any consideration.

The election methodology is spelled out more specifically on the EarlTurnerAlliance blog. The individual makes it clear that if a majority of National Alliance members vote to retain Erich Gliebe as Chairman, the decision will be respected.

What we are asking now is for members to contact other members and inform them of what is about to take place and that is the vote, in regards to if Erich Gliebe stays as chairman or if he is to be dismissed.

Once the word is out in full force and all members are aware of the upcoming vote, we will set a date and time for the vote to take place. We will use the National Alliance Office and man the phones for a call in vote. The vote will consist of your membership number and if you vote for Erich Gliebe or against him. No names will be used, just the member numbers. The business manager will verify from the members list if the member is in good standing before the vote is counted.

Once the votes are counted the results will be posted for all to read. If Erich Gliebe is found to retain his position then so be it. If Erich Gliebe if found to have been dismissed then he will be removed from the Alliance.

If Erich Gliebe is removed, members will be asked to submit names for the positions of the five board members, we will the use the same method to elect the board members.

Reaction on Stormfront is universally sympathetic, and I can understand why. While I have never had any dealings with Erich Gliebe, it's obvious that under his leadership, the National Alliance is stuck on a treadmill in caretaker mode. The most active member is Robert Ransdell, the Cincinnati Unit Coordinator. He and his troops have been distributing flyers, maintaining an Adopt-A-Highway stretch outside of Florence, KY, and confronting Holocaust cheerleaders when they come to Cincinnati. In addition, Ransdell writes most of the news stories for Natallnews. In short, he's been a one-man dynamo carrying a disproportionate share of the load, and he would be a worthy successor to Erich Gliebe.

In 2007, Francis Playfair documented his take on the decline and fall of the National Alliance HERE. Additional problems brough to light by the Kevin Strom tapes are documented on Hadley's blog. And of course, there are problems with Erich Gliebe documented on various anti-racist sites like the SPLC and Searchlight, but they intermingle truth and fiction so thoroughly that their output is fundamentally untrustworthy. Here's a report from the Fall 2009 SPLC Intelligence Report to get an idea about what the other side is saying about Gliebe.

What these reformers need to do to ensure success is to convince Robert Ransdell to go along with them. If they can bring him on board, Gliebe's history. The National Alliance has had enough of caretaker leadership; it now needs innovative leadership to effectively exploit the unique outreach opportunities afforded by the election of Barack Obama.

Australian Patriot Brendon O'Connell Accuses Former VNN Poster Mike Mazzone Of Being An ADL Operative Or A Police Agent

Self-professed WN and self-proclaimed cocksmith Mike Mazzone accompanied by his chippy du jour

An anti-Zionist activist in Australia who's being officially persecuted by the Australian government is accusing a former Vanguard News Network Forum member, Mike Mazzone, of being a possible ADL operative and/or a police agent. Although the evidence presented is circumstantial, it is voluminous, and the accuser has some credibility.

Brendon O'Connell, an Australian patriot who was arrested in May 2009 and charged with racial incitement for speaking out against Zionism, and who could face 14 years in prison, makes the accusation in this post on his personal blog. First, he claims that the Argue With Everyone (AWE) forum under the direction of its webmaster, Kevin Kneupper, is an ADL honeypot. Then he launches into his accusations against Mazzone.

He first identifies the AWE poster "SaintHitler" as being closely involved with Kneupper, acting the role of a "kosher Nazi" on Kneupper's ADL honeypot forum. Then he identifies "SaintHitler" as Mike Mazzone. That's right, "the" Mike Mazzone from Palatine, Illinois, who turned out to be one of the creepiest posters in the history of VNN Forum, always bragging about being a world-class "dancemaster" and "cocksmith", and winding up his tenure at VNN by endlessly spamming the forum with YouTube links until Alex Linder finally cut him off.

Later he posts the following statement about Mazzone:

"SaintHitler" is an American Jew named Mike Mazzone. He lives in the suburb of Palatine just outside of Chicago. "SaintHitler" is a "proud supporter" of the Jewish Internet Defense Force. He boasts of a desire to "rape and torture" women and has regularly posted images of hardcore pornography on Argue With Everyone. "SaintHitler" holds James Linton and Steve Johnson in high regard. He says he is a "Steve Johnson fan". Jim Kerr's expose of Johnson is a "must read".

Below is a screenshot of one of "SaintHitler's" posts, where he identifies himself as a proud supporter of the Jewish Internet Defense Force (JIDF):



O'Connell also posts the following statement:

Please note the "successfully targeted for entrapment by Federal Agents provocateur". When you realize that Mike Mazzone is playing the role of over -the-top "kosher Nazi" at a political forum run by a lawyer (Kevin Kneupper) who works for the McKool-Smith Law firm which boasts of a "proud relationship" with the Jewish run Anti-Defamation League, you can begin to draw some legitimate speculative conclusions. We can then link Mazzone to James Linton, who boasted that he could have me found by his next door neighbor who works in the Australian equivalent of the FBI - the Australian Federal Police. Are we beginning to connect some dots?

And O'Connell posts yet another damning statement:

Mike Mazzone appears to like making himself known all over the world wide web. He posts his name and location quite openly. He is a member of a political forum called "Argue With Everyone" - a forum run by a lawyer who works for a law firm that boasts of a "proud relationship" with the ADL AND links directly to U.S Government institutions and Mike Mazzone posts as a crazed "neo-Nazi" under the alias of "SaintHitler". Mazzone has directly threatened to rape, torture, "gut", and hang by a "meat hook", an American female friend of mine.

For good measure, Mazzone posted a picture of a murder with a human body hung on a meat hook - (screenshots not yet available). His depravity on that forum is beyond belief, and the owner of the AWE forum, Kevin Kneupper, has done nothing despite receiving dozens of complaints. But why would Kevin Kneupper want to ban Mazzone from his forum? Mazzone works for him and the ADL. Mazzone is also a member of White Nationalist Forums such as Vanguard News Network, where he is to be found plugging Ron Paul of all people.

Of course, although Mazzone did whore himself extensively for Ron Paul, who led us on but then let us down, Mazzone has long since been banned from VNN Forum. Nevertheless, the allegations presented by Brendon O'Connell are sufficiently specific and damning that they warrant precautions on our part. Consequently, I would urge White activists to avoid getting involved with any activism involving Mazzone.

Whitelaw Towers tells us that not only are the Australian political police continuing to push the original charges against O'Connell, but in November 2009, he was raided once again by the Western Australian police's ‘State Security Investigation Group’. He has been charged a second time under Western Australia’s odious racial vilification laws, and now faces two lots of 14 years imprisonment. The Australia First Party has spoken out in O'Donnell's favor HERE.

Day 3 Of The Bill White Federal Trial In Roanoke: VNN's Alex Linder Gives Technical Testimony, Leonard Pitts "Cries Himself A River"

On Day 3 of the Federal trial of national socialist activist Bill White in Roanoke, Virginia, attention was focused on the second of White's alleged victims: Syndicated columnist Leonard Pitts. Pitts merited special attention from White after he (Pitts) wrote that flippant, contemptuous, and disrespectful 2007 "Cry Me A River" column after the barbaric details of the Christian-Newsom atrocities came to light as a result of the VNN-led Rally Against Black Crime in Knoxville on May 26th, 2007. WSLS Channel 10 story HERE.

-- Roanoke Times blog coverage of the entire trial HERE.
-- Roanoke Times blog coverage of Day 3 only HERE.
-- Archive of Roanoke Times print stories of entire case HERE.
-- All posts on the Bill White Roanoke trial available HERE, with the most recent post displaying first.

But first, Dave Wilson, the senior editor for administration from the Miami Herald, testified. Wilson is the boss of columnist Leonard Pitts, who was allegedly threatened by Bill White. Pitts, whose column is syndicated and published nationwide, including in the Roanoke Times, allegedly started receiving e-mail threats from White in June of 2007. In response, Wilson testified that the Miami Herald set up armed security at Pitts’ Maryland home, where he works, during that month. He also testified that he personally received two e-mails from someone going under the name R. James which he felt were direct threats to Leonard Pitts. The prosecution is trying to prove that R. James is in fact Bill White. R. James is actually believed to be a troll or a police agent who once posted regularly on the Vanguard News Network Forum, urging people to commit illegal acts.

In cross-examination, White’s attorneys suggested that Pitts’ column about black-on-white crime was intended to stir things up, suggesting that Pitts is "no shrinking violet" in the rough-and-tumble world of political discourse, a premise to which Wilson agreed.

But because Bill White also posted prolifically on VNN Forum under several separate usernames (in succession, not simultaneously), VNN editor Alex Linder was called to testify, and did so by teleconference so that the Feds would not have to pay to fly him to Roanoke. Beginning on page 4 of this VNN Forum thread, Linder stated that it was no more than 15 minutes of pro-forma questions verifying that he owns the forum and keeps the records of Bill's user names and that kind of thing. White's lawyer Damico cross-examined, asking whether admins/mods could go in and change posts, which of course they technically can. Nothing really in dispute as far as he could see. Linder also stated that the subpoena demanded he produce IPs for Bill's usernames, which he did. He gave them IPs for two Bill White usernames, "ANSWP Commander" and "billwhite." And he gave them the IP info for "R. James." He also had to provide the registration information for these usernames.

Then Pitts took the stand, testifying today that his blood ran cold when he realized he was being targeted by a neo-Nazi leader. "I feel like I have been violated," cried Pitts. Pitts said he viewed the e-mail as a threat –- and became even more concerned after he realized that White had posted his home address and telephone number on a website frequented by fellow white supremacists. "He is essentially inviting them and daring them to commit violence," Pitts testified.

On cross examination, White’s attorney suggested that Pitts was trying to be provocative and draw people to his work. In response, Pitts said,"My job is not to worry about getting people to read my column...My job is to write the best column that I can ... and after that it’s out of my hands." After Pitts testified, his 19-year-old daughter took the stand — backing his testimony about how fearful her family became after White wrote her father an e-mail addressed to "N----- Pitts".

Cry me a river, Pitts. In your column, you presumed that all whites are equally privileged because of the lifestyles of the white elite, who actually move to suburbs and gated communities to get away from your people, yet impose forced diversity and multiculturalism upon the rest of us. You ignore the fact that thousands of white Americans lose social standing and even employability every year because they oppose affirmative action and white-bashing. You have failed to effectively and consistently call your racial community to account for their disproportionate misbehavior.

Yeah, Pitts, cry ME a river, punk! When Bill White jacked you up, I enjoyed it!

Meanwhile, Bill White continued his practice of listening intently to testimony and taking notes, periodically conferring with his defense team. His wife, Meghan White, attended the trial during Day 1, but because she's expected to testify at some point, she was instructed to leave the courtroom, and has not returned.

More information to be posted later when available and if meaningful.

American Political Prisoner Bill White's 17-Page Handwritten Statement On His Arrest, Incarceration, Trial, And Operation Hopeful Eagle

Vanguard News Network editor Alex Linder has posted the contents of a 17-page handwritten letter from political prisoner Bill White, beginning on page 3 of this thread. The letter was not sent to him directly, but a copy was forwarded to him. Linder's motive is not personal affinity, since he and White had differences in the past, but he wants to use VNN Forum to make sure that justice is served through the airing of all evidence from all parties. Alex Linder confirms that the letter is the same in form as the shorter letter he received from White earlier - same handwriting and paper.

To ensure adequate redundancy should VNN Forum become unavailable, I am cross-posting it on here. However, I am eliminating the page markers for better readability. Read the full letter after the jump

AIDS Awareness Flyers Distributed At Boise State University Characterized As "Racist" Because They're Critical Of Blacks

A young lady briefly detained while distributing AIDS awareness flyers on the campus of Boise State University has learned one of the ten commandments of university life - thou shalt not criticize blacks. Media stories from KTVB Channel 7, the Idaho Statesman, and The Arbiter. Discussion posted on Stormfront and The Phora.

The occasion was World AIDS Day, and the unidentified lady decided to distribute AIDS awareness flyers by embedding them in copies of The Arbiter, the "independent" student newspaper. At the top, the flyers read "Don't Catch AIDS!". Towards the middle, the flyer warned against having sex with intravenous drug users and bisexuals. Getting a bit warmer. But then on the bottom - the money shot; "Blacks are walking STD factories" and "once u go black we don't want u back".

Ding Ding Ding! Racist Alert! Time for the witch hunt to begin! And sure enough, it was a black student who started the witch hunt.

Senior Jalara Walker, a black student from California, had enjoyed her time on campus up until this point, but is now apprehensive after finding several of the flyers in a class. Walker said she laughed at first, thinking it absurd, but then left class to report it to the dean's office. "It just makes me uncomfortably aware that I shouldn't be here. That's what I feel like. I don't want to go back to school," Walker said. She says the dean's office told her they knew of the fliers. Now, a week later she says BSU has taken little action. “I don't feel that it was made as big of a deal as it should've been because it is a big deal," said Walker.

The president of the Black Student Alliance says the flier is insulting to the entire campus, not just black students. Out of BSU's nearly 19,000 students, 361 are black. Of course, he doesn't explain why all students should be insulted, though.

According to BSU spokesman Frank Zang, university officials are aware that the fliers are being distributed on campus. Campus police and the Boise Police Department have open, ongoing investigations. "Boise State strives to provide a culture of civility and success where all feel safe and free from discrimination, harassment, threats and intimidation," Zang said. "The university has both an anti-harassment policy and a student code of conduct with potential corrective action, pending the investigation."

Dwight Murphy, the advertising manager for The Arbiter, actually caught the unidentified woman in the act of embedding flyers in the newspapers. He confronted her, telling her she was not allowed do that. "She didn't say much other than, ‘Oh, oh,’ kind of hesitated and everything and walked away," said Murphy. He did not take her name. Initially, he didn't know what was printed on the flyers, but as soon as he found out he called police. Boise police spokeswoman Lynn Hightower said it is unclear if placing the flyers is criminal act.

By the way, lost in all the politically correct furor is the fact that the flyer is accurate about the racial disparity in STDs. According to the CDC:

-- Blacks accounted for 51% of the 42,655 (including children) new HIV/AIDS diagnoses in 34 states with long-term, confidential name-based HIV reporting.
-- Blacks accounted for 48% of the 551,932 persons (including children) living with HIV/AIDS in 34 states with long-term, confidential name-based HIV reporting.
-- For black women living with HIV/AIDS, the most common methods of transmission were high-risk heterosexual contact and injection drug use.
-- For black men living with HIV/AIDS, the most common methods of HIV transmission were (in order) sexual contact with other men, injection drug use, high-risk heterosexual contact.

But the politically-correct commissars at BSU would deny this important information to students because some might find it offensive. In other words, diversity is allowed to trump safety.

Aryan Nations Activists Distribute Pro-White Racist Flyers In Sandpoint, Idaho Just Four Days Before Sarah Palin's Visit To The Area

The Bonner County Daily Bee reports that, just four days before Sarah Palin's stops in Coeur d'Alene and Sandpoint, Idaho for her book tour, flyers produced by the local Aryan Nations contingent were distributed in Sandpoint early on Sunday December 6th, 2009. The flyers were sealed in sandwich bags and weighted down with a rock. One side of the flyer advocates for whites to band together, while the other side is an Aryan Nations application for membership.

The flyers appear to be the same as those distributed in Coeur d’Alene, Spirit Lake, Athol and Spokane Valley, Washington earlier this year. Athol resident Paul R. Mullet and two other activists were cited for misdemeanor littering in connection with the flyers found in Coeur d’Alene, but city authorities dropped the charges on December 3rd after determining that the flyers were no different than other political literature. So although Sandpoint Police Chief Mark Lockwood is contemplating littering charges, he's not likely to go through with it.

However, one of the people receiving a flyer is a member of the Bonner County Human Rights Task Force, and she happens to be Jewish. So the Task Force immediately went into action and issued the obligatory statement of condemnation:

“While the Bonner County Human Rights Task Force supports freedom of expression as stated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, we strongly oppose the clandestine distribution of an application to join their organization by a group from Athol, Idaho calling themselves, ‘The Aryan Nation.’ The application specifically states they are ‘National Socialist in Political Orientation,’ and therefore racist, and a hate group. Our community has repeatedly expressed that they neither agree with, nor advocate the actions, beliefs and alleged facts promoted by racist and hate groups.”

Oy, vey. The Task Force needs to make up their minds; do they support freedom of expression, or do they oppose the dsitribution of membership applications for a group which they have arbitrarily decreed a "hate group" simply because it is racialist?

Day 2 Of The Bill White Federal Trial In Roanoke: Citibank Employee Jennifer Petsche Testified On How Bill White's Internet Threats Upset Her

In Day 2 of the Federal trial of Bill White in Roanoke, Virginia, one of White's alleged victims testified as to how upset she was over White's Internet threats and how they degraded her productivity as a worker. Coverage by WSLS Channel 10 HERE. Continuing coverage from the following sources:

-- Roanoke Times blog coverage of the entire trial HERE.
-- Roanoke Times blog coverage of Day 2 only HERE.

But before that, there were opening statements by both the prosecution and the defense. Representing the prosecution was Cindy Chung, who stressed how Bill White sought out a group of diverse strangers and targeted them with a series of threats and intimidation.

Representing the defense was Ray Ferris, who admitted that Bill White did some ugly and obnoxious things. But Ferris asserted that the real test is whether or not White's nasty comments and racial slurs were actually threats. If not, they are covered by the First Amendment. Assisting the defense is David Damico (unlike Hal Turner, at least Bill White found some white attorneys).

The supervisor of Citibank employee Jennifer Petsche, Rachel Dixon, who is the departmental manager of Citi Group’s collection wing in Kansas City, then took the stand, stating that Petsche "went to pieces" after she found out that Bill White had dug up the woman's home telephone number and address as well as contact information on her families, then sent her an e-mail to inform her that he had done so. An unidentified Citi internal investigator took the stand next, explaining to the jury how he investigated the email and turned his findings over to the Kansas City office of the FBI. The investigator said White called Citi’s Kansas City location 46 times during a three hour period on March 21st, 2007.

Finally, it was time for Citibank employee Jennifer Petsche to take the stand. Petsche, who works in Kansas City, had no idea who White was when he first e-mailed her about a dispute over his credit card. The more she learned, the more fearful she became of the neo-Nazi leader. After White suggested that she might meet the same fate as Chicago Federal Judge Joan Lefkow, whose husband and mother were murdered, Petsche began to screen her calls and obtained an unlisted phone number. The personal information was also posted on White's defunct Overthrow.com website, and an account of the exchange posted on the inaccessible Overthrow88 blog.

Day 1 Of The Bill White Federal Trial In Roanoke, Virginia Focuses On Jury Selection; Some Jurors Already Excused For Bias Against "Neo-Nazis"

Day 1 of the Federal trial of ANSWP Commander Bill White in Roanoke, Virginia focused on jury selection. The fundamental question to be resolved during the trial: Did Bill White's online posts amount to "true threats," as defined by federal law, or did his words stop short of "inciting or producing imminent lawless action," and thus fall under the protection of the First Amendment? The Roanoke Times is providing dedicated coverage of the proceedings HERE.

Roanoke Times blogger Dan Casey earlier weighed in on the challenges of selecting a jury in this case. The first wave of 66 prospective jurors was called and quizzed beginning at 9:30 A.M. EST. Twenty have now been excused either because they said they could not give White a fair trial due to his racist views or because they had plans or medical conditions that prevented them from serving over the next two or three weeks. In particular, nine of those excused said they disapproved so strongly of White's neo-Nazi views that they could not render a fair verdict. On the other hand, many more of the jurors said that although they had heard or read about the case, they could keep an open mind.

Jurors are being quizzed in depth as to their views on white supremacy, Adolf Hitler and swastikas. One man said he had a swastika tattooed on his left leg (he was ultimately excluded). Some jurors, particuloarly the Black jurors, visibly recoiled at the word "nigger" which White uses regularly in his online comments. The problem is that the word "nigger" will come out frequently as the prosecution makes its case. WSLS Channel 10 now reports that jury selection is complete; an all-white jury of 10 men and 4 women have been chosen. Twelve are primaries and two are alternates. However, the fact that the jury is described as "all-white" does not preclude the possibility of the presence of Jews; Jews are considered white by mainstream society.

After the jury was selected, Roanoke NAACP dominatrix Brenda Hale complained, "I just cannot fathom how they ended up with an all-white jury. How can you have equal justice in the courtroom when you don't have a representation of the overall community?" But unlike cases tried in Roanoke's state court, the panelists for this Federal case came from a wide swath of Southwest Virginia that is predominantly white, rather than just from the city.

Various news stories are referring to the seven charges levied against Bill White. As put forth in this previous post, the Federal charges faced by White in Roanoke include using his website to make threats against a half-dozen or so targets, including the so-called "civil rights attorney" Richard Warman in Canada, the nationally syndicated black newspaper columnist Leonard "Cry Me A River" Pitts, and an insignificant small-town black mayor in New Jersey. Specifically, he is charged with five counts of communicating threats in interstate commerce, one count of communicating an extortionate threat in interstate commerce, and one count of witness intimidation. He is accused of "targeting" individuals with whom he disagreed from 2006 to 2008 for racial reasons. The 19-page indictment can be read HERE.

If found guilty of communicating threats in interstate commerce, White could face a maximum punishment of five years in prison for each count of the indictment. If found guilty of communicating extortionate threats in interstate commerce, White could face a maximum punishment of 20 years in prison. If found guilty of witness intimidation, White faces a maximum punishment of ten years in prison. Each of the aforementioned charges also entails a potential fine of up to $250,000.

Bill White faced similar charges in Chicago, but the judge dismissed the case on July 21st, 2009 before it could go to trial. In the Roanoke trial, the judge has not ruled out dismissing the case at some point, but he feels the government deserves an opportunity to make its case. To quote Judge James Turk, "I think the indictment is sufficient to go to trial. It may not be sufficient to go to a jury." The outcome may well depend upon whether Bill White is willing to concentrate on defending his actions and linking them inextricably to the First Amendment rather than making some of the vainglorious political statements he's made in the past. It would be smart if Bill White chooses not to testify himself during the trial.